Litigation: Cases
Sponsored Links
- Arlington Cent. Sch. Dist. Bd. of Educ. v. Murphy, 548 U.S. 291 (2006) An Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) provision that permits a court to "award reasonable attorneys' fees as part of the costs" to prevailing parents, does not authorize prevailing parents to recover expert fees.
- Comm'r of Internal Revenue Serv. v. Banks, 543 U.S. 426 (2005) In calculating federal income tax, when a litigant's recovery constitutes income, the litigant's income includes the portion of the recovery paid to the attorney as a contingent fee.
- Martin v. Franklin Capital Corp., 546 U.S. 132 (2005) Upon remand of a case to state court, absent unusual circumstances, attorney's fees should not be awarded under 28 U.S.C. section 1447(c) when the removing party has an objectively reasonable basis for removal; conversely, where no objectively reasonable basis exists, fees should be awarded.
- Sole v. Wyner, 127 S.Ct. 2188 (2007) In the context of attorney's fee awards in private actions brought under 42 U.S.C. section 1983 and other specified measures designed to secure civil rights, prevailing party status does not attend achievement of a preliminary injunction that is reversed, dissolved, or otherwise undone by the final decision in the same case.
- Travelers Cas. & Surety Co. of Am. v. Pac. Gas & Elec. Co., 127 S.Ct. 1199 (2007) Federal bankruptcy law does not disallow contract-based claims for attorney's fees based solely on the fact that the fees were incurred litigating bankruptcy law issues.
Ads by FindLaw